OPEX vs CAPEX: What’s the Difference? A Complete Guide for Businesses

Most businesses face the OPEX vs CAPEX question when planning a major investment. Consider a manufacturing company looking to reduce its electricity costs through solar energy. It can either purchase the solar system outright and own it or pay for the electricity through recurring payments without making a large upfront investment.

Neither option is inherently better. Each affects cash flow, ownership, accounting treatment and maintenance responsibilities differently. CAPEX, or capital expenditure, refers to money invested in a long-term asset that the business owns and uses for several years. OPEX, or operating expenditure, covers recurring expenses associated with running the business. In solar projects, the choice usually comes down to owning the system or using solar power through an arrangement managed by a third-party provider..

What Is the CAPEX Model?

Here, the business pays for the solar system itself and keeps it. No third party involved.

That means the company covers the panels, the inverter, the mounting structure, installation, and whatever else the project needs. Once everything’s installed, the system starts producing electricity for the business.

The upside is control. The company picks its own equipment, its own contractor, decides on the design, chooses who handles maintenance. Every unit of power the system generates goes straight to benefiting the business.

The tradeoff is that someone has to pay for all of it upfront, and the business is on the hook for maintenance, insurance, monitoring, and performance unless it hands those off to someone else.

Example of the CAPEX Model in Solar

Take a manufacturing company putting a rooftop solar system on its own building. It writes the check for the whole project and, from day one, the system is theirs. Less power gets pulled from the grid every month after that, and the setup shows up on the balance sheet as a long-term asset the company holds onto.

This setup tends to fit companies that have capital to spend, energy needs that don’t swing much, and no plans to leave the property anytime soon.

What Is the OPEX Model?

No purchase happens here. The business pays to use the asset, and whoever supplies it, typically the provider, is the one who owns and operates it.

For a solar project, that means a third party finances, installs, and maintains the system at the company’s site. The business doesn’t put money down for the installation. It just pays for the electricity it draws, under a long-term deal known as a Power Purchase Agreement, or PPA.

Example of the OPEX Model in Solar

Say a company would love a lower power bill but just can’t justify a big solar spend at the moment. That’s where a provider steps in, sets the whole system up at the company’s site, and handles the upkeep from there on. The company’s only real cost is the electricity it draws, billed at a rate the two sides settled on ahead of time.

This route suits businesses that want to keep their cash free for other things and would rather not deal with maintenance at all. Before signing on though, it’s worth checking the contract length, the tariff, payment terms, any performance guarantees, and how ownership and exit clauses are handled.

OPEX vs CAPEX: Key Differences, Benefits and Limitations

Boiled down, CAPEX is the capital spent to buy and own a long-term asset, while OPEX is the operating cost paid again and again just to use one. That one difference ripples through almost everything else.

Money upfront is the clearest split. CAPEX usually demands a large payment before anything even gets switched on. OPEX asks for little to nothing at the start, since the cost gets spread across the contract instead. Ownership follows the same logic. Buy under CAPEX and the business holds the asset. Go with OPEX and it’s the provider who typically keeps title to it, while the business just pays to use what’s there.

The way each shows up in the books differs too. A CAPEX purchase gets booked as a long-term asset and depreciates over the years. OPEX payments tend to sit as regular operating expenses instead, though the exact treatment can shift depending on the accounting standard in play. Maintenance follows ownership in a similar way: buy the asset and the business is the one fixing, replacing, and monitoring it, unless that gets handed off separately. Lease it under OPEX and the provider usually takes care of all that upkeep and monitoring on its own.

Control tends to sit with whoever owns the equipment. A business that owns its system gets to make the calls on upgrades and operations. Under OPEX, some of that control shifts to the provider, or ends up shared between the two. Cash flow tells a similar story from the other direction: CAPEX takes a real hit upfront, while OPEX spreads the cost out and keeps more cash free along the way. Over the long run, CAPEX can actually work out cheaper once the initial spend is paid off, whereas OPEX’s total cost hinges more on how the contract, tariff, and payment terms are structured.

CAPEX vs OPEX: Which Model Adds More Value?

If the priority is getting solar running without a big check upfront, OPEX model solar makes more sense.

Go the CAPEX route and the company funds the project itself, keeping the system as its own asset. That gives it a say over equipment choices, maintenance schedules, how performance gets tracked, and how future energy needs get planned. Companies with money on hand, fairly stable power demand, and no plans to relocate tend to do well with this.

Go the OPEX route and it’s usually the solar developer footing the bill, owning and running the system. The business just buys the power it uses, at a rate locked in through a PPA. That takes the pressure off working capital and makes solar a lot easier to adopt for companies that would rather have predictable bills than take on an asset.

So really, CAPEX model solar is for businesses chasing ownership and control, OPEX is for businesses chasing lower upfront cost and less hassle. Which one actually works out better depends on things like available capital, how much power gets used, who owns the site, financing costs, contract terms, and how far ahead the business is planning.

Type of Investment: CAPEX vs OPEX

CAPEX is straightforward capital investment. The business pays upfront, buys the system, and owns a long-term asset that keeps paying it back in electricity for years.

OPEX isn’t really an investment in the asset at all. The business usually doesn’t own the system, a developer does, and the company just pays for the power that comes out of it based on an agreed rate.

CAPEX is about owning something. OPEX is about using something. One suits businesses after long-term ownership, the other suits businesses that want solar without a big upfront cost and would rather have steady, predictable bills instead.

Conclusion

Sorting out OPEX vs CAPEX matters before committing to a commercial solar project. With CAPEX, the business pays upfront, owns the plant, and keeps the benefit of the electricity it generates going forward. With OPEX, the business pays recurring charges for solar power and usually never owns the equipment. CAPEX tends to work for companies with capital available, long-term plans for the site, and a need for full control. An OPEX arrangement tends to work better for businesses trying to protect their cash flow, avoid maintenance responsibilities, and still get onto solar through payments they can predict. Figuring out which one fits comes down to cash flow, power consumption, financing costs, contract terms, and how far out the business is planning. Aykka Technovision Private Limited can help walk through which model actually fits a given site and energy profile.

FAQs